GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs UHD Graphics P630

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics P630 and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

UHD Graphics P630
2020
15 Watt
6.39

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER outperforms UHD Graphics P630 by a whopping 1184% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5697
Place by popularitynot in top-10065
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data48.52
Power efficiency29.5019.94
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameComet Lake GT2AD103
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date13 May 2020 (4 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1928448
Core clock speed350 MHz2340 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHz2610 MHz
Number of transistorsno data45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+++5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt285 Watt
Texture fill rate28.80689.0
Floating-point processing power0.4608 TFLOPS44.1 TFLOPS
ROPs396
TMUs24264
Tensor Coresno data264
Ray Tracing Coresno data66

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data310 mm
WidthIGP3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6X
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1313 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data672.3 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.11.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics P630 6.39
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 82.07
+1184%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics P630 2465
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 31669
+1185%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18−20
−1189%
232
+1189%
1440p12−14
−1242%
161
+1242%
4K6−7
−1367%
88
+1367%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.44
1440pno data4.96
4Kno data9.08

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−5500%
160−170
+5500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−5900%
120−130
+5900%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Hitman 3 4−5
−3125%
120−130
+3125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−3538%
290−300
+3538%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−8900%
350−400
+8900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−450%
150−160
+450%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−5500%
160−170
+5500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−5900%
120−130
+5900%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Hitman 3 4−5
−3125%
120−130
+3125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−3538%
290−300
+3538%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−10950%
442
+10950%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−1933%
180−190
+1933%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−450%
150−160
+450%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−5500%
160−170
+5500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−5900%
120−130
+5900%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Hitman 3 4−5
−3125%
120−130
+3125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−3538%
290−300
+3538%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−10075%
407
+10075%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−2233%
210
+2233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−414%
144
+414%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Hitman 3 6−7
−1900%
120−130
+1900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−11000%
220−230
+11000%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−6200%
120−130
+6200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−7100%
70−75
+7100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 65−70

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−4850%
95−100
+4850%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Battlefield 5 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Battlefield 5 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Metro Exodus 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 306
+0%
306
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 159
+0%
159
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Hitman 3 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Metro Exodus 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 162
+0%
162
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 69
+0%
69
+0%

This is how UHD Graphics P630 and RTX 4070 Ti SUPER compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 1189% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 1242% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 1367% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 11000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is ahead in 25 tests (38%)
  • there's a draw in 40 tests (62%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.39 82.07
Recency 13 May 2020 8 January 2024
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 285 Watt

UHD Graphics P630 has 1800% lower power consumption.

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, on the other hand, has a 1184.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics P630 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics P630
UHD Graphics P630
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 50 votes

Rate UHD Graphics P630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 2259 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.