UHD Graphics 750 vs UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 24EUs UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
VS
UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 605 UHD Graphics 610 UHD Graphics 615 UHD Graphics 617 UHD Graphics 620 UHD Graphics 630 UHD Graphics 710 UHD Graphics 730 UHD Graphics 750 UHD Graphics 770

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) with UHD Graphics 750, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
2021
4 Watt
2.00

UHD Graphics 750 outperforms UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) by a whopping 125% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics 750 UHD Graphics 750

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking884655
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.8520.73
ArchitectureGen. 11 (2021)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameGen. 11Rocket Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date11 January 2021 (3 years ago)30 March 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32256
Core clock speed350 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHz1300 MHz
Manufacturing process technology10 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)4.8 - 10 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data20.80
Floating-point processing powerno data0.6656 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataRing Bus
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD9
−100%
18−21
+100%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−100%
8−9
+100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−1000%
10−12
+1000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−100%
8−9
+100%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−250%
27−30
+250%
Hitman 3 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−76.5%
30−33
+76.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−70%
16−18
+70%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−25.7%
40−45
+25.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−1000%
10−12
+1000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−100%
8−9
+100%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−250%
27−30
+250%
Hitman 3 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−76.5%
30−33
+76.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9
−88.9%
16−18
+88.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−41.7%
16−18
+41.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−25.7%
40−45
+25.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−100%
8−9
+100%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−250%
27−30
+250%
Hitman 3 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6
−400%
30−33
+400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 13
−30.8%
16−18
+30.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3
−467%
16−18
+467%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−25.7%
40−45
+25.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Hitman 3 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
−155%
27−30
+155%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 2−3
Far Cry 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 1−2

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hitman 3 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) and UHD Graphics 750 compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 750 is 100% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics 750 is 1000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 750 is ahead in 48 tests (80%)
  • there's a draw in 12 tests (20%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 2.00 4.49
Recency 11 January 2021 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 10 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 15 Watt

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) has a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 275% lower power consumption.

UHD Graphics 750, on the other hand, has a 124.5% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 2 months.

The UHD Graphics 750 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) is a notebook card while UHD Graphics 750 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
Intel UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 750
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
vs
R7 (Carrizo) Radeon R7 (Carrizo)
UHD Graphics 750 UHD Graphics 750
vs
Iris Plus Graphics 655 Iris Plus Graphics 655
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
vs
R7 (Bristol Ridge) Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)
ATI 9700 PRO Radeon 9700 PRO
vs
GV10B GV10B
UHD Graphics 620 UHD Graphics 620
vs
RTX 5000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
6800 XT GeForce 6800 XT
vs
Edge 3D 3400XL Edge 3D 3400XL
ATI HD 5550 Radeon HD 5550
vs
ATI RV100 RV100
Tegra X1 GPU Tegra X1 GPU
vs
UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)
HD 6350A Radeon HD 6350A
vs
Broadwell GT3 Broadwell GT3
RX 460 Radeon RX 460
vs
HD 7850M Radeon HD 7850M
RX Vega 5 Radeon RX Vega 5
vs
RTX 4070 GeForce RTX 4070
GTX 850M GeForce GTX 850M
vs
RTX 3080 Ti 20 GB GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 20 GB
Pro 555 Radeon Pro 555
vs
ATI X1650 GT Radeon X1650 GT

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 17 votes

Rate UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 388 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.