RTX A4500 Mobile vs UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)

Place in the ranking	887	76
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	13.90	22.49
Architecture	Gen. 11 (2021)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Gen. 11	GA104
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	11 January 2021 (3 years ago)	22 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	32	5888
Core clock speed	350 MHz	930 MHz
Boost clock speed	900 MHz	1500 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	4.8 - 10 Watt	140 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	276.0
Floating-point processing power	no data	17.66 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	96
TMUs	no data	184
Tensor Cores	no data	184
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	46

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	no data	PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	no data	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	no data	16 GB
Memory bus width	no data	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	512.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

Portable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12_1	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.7
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	3.0
Vulkan	-	1.3
CUDA	-	8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−2150%

180−190
+2150%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5
+100%

2−3

−100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%
Battlefield 5	1−2 −2000%	21−24 +2000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −2067%	65−70 +2067%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −2100%	110−120 +2100%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −2150%	180−190 +2150%
Hitman 3	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 +113%	8−9 −113%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −2150%	90−95 +2150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +25%	27−30 −25%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%
Battlefield 5	1−2 −2000%	21−24 +2000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −2067%	65−70 +2067%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −2100%	110−120 +2100%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −2150%	180−190 +2150%
Hitman 3	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 +113%	8−9 −113%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −2150%	90−95 +2150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9 +125%	4−5 −125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 +33.3%	9−10 −33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +25%	27−30 −25%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −2067%	65−70 +2067%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −2150%	180−190 +2150%
Hitman 3	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
Horizon Zero Dawn	6 −33.3%	8−9 +33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	13 +225%	4−5 −225%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3 −200%	9−10 +200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +25%	27−30 −25%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−2150%

90−95
+2150%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −2067%	65−70 +2067%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −2067%	65−70 +2067%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −2150%	45−50 +2150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −2000%	21−24 +2000%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	2−3 −2150%	45−50 +2150%
Hitman 3	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −2000%	21−24 +2000%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−12 −2082%	240−250 +2082%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5−6
+150%

2−3

−150%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

1−2

−2000%

21−24
+2000%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	1−2 −2000%	21−24 +2000%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4
+50%

2−3

−50%

This is how UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) and RTX A4500 Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX A4500 Mobile is 2150% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) is 225% faster.
in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX A4500 Mobile is 200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) is ahead in 27 tests (93%)
RTX A4500 Mobile is ahead in 2 tests (7%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.00	45.29
Recency	11 January 2021	22 March 2022
Chip lithography	10 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	4 Watt	140 Watt

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) has 3400% lower power consumption.

RTX A4500 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 2164.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A4500 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) is a notebook graphics card while RTX A4500 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.