Radeon RX 6600 vs UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) with Radeon RX 6600, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
2021
4 Watt
1.39

RX 6600 outperforms UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) by a whopping 2724% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1002107
Place by popularitynot in top-10013
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data68.17
Power efficiency10.0321.46
ArchitectureGen. 11 (2021)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGen. 11Navi 23
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date11 January 2021 (3 years ago)13 October 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores241792
Core clock speed350 MHz1626 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHz2491 MHz
Number of transistorsno data11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)4.8 - 10 Watt132 Watt
Texture fill rateno data279.0
Floating-point processing powerno data8.928 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data190 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112.0 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) 1.39
RX 6600 39.26
+2724%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) 3411
RX 6600 94734
+2677%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) 854
RX 6600 31774
+3621%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) 645
RX 6600 23366
+3523%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) 4911
RX 6600 145870
+2871%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) 43610
RX 6600 545762
+1151%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD9
−1189%
116
+1189%
1440p2−3
−2950%
61
+2950%
4K1−2
−3000%
31
+3000%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2575%
107
+2575%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−1283%
80−85
+1283%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−1875%
75−80
+1875%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2175%
91
+2175%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−8400%
85−90
+8400%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−3133%
95−100
+3133%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−6267%
190−200
+6267%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1550%
99
+1550%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−1064%
160−170
+1064%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−4500%
90−95
+4500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−1688%
140−150
+1688%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−291%
120−130
+291%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−1283%
80−85
+1283%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−1875%
75−80
+1875%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1725%
73
+1725%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−8400%
85−90
+8400%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−3133%
95−100
+3133%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−6267%
190−200
+6267%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1483%
95
+1483%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−1064%
160−170
+1064%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−4500%
90−95
+4500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6
−2933%
182
+2933%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−636%
80−85
+636%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−291%
120−130
+291%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−1283%
80−85
+1283%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−1875%
75−80
+1875%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1375%
59
+1375%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−8400%
85−90
+8400%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−6267%
190−200
+6267%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1333%
86
+1333%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−914%
142
+914%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−1863%
157
+1863%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−718%
90
+718%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−75.8%
58
+75.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−4500%
90−95
+4500%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−7400%
75−80
+7400%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−2900%
60−65
+2900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−4100%
40−45
+4100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 45−50
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3300%
34
+3300%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Hitman 3 7−8
−671%
54
+671%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−1940%
102
+1940%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−5600%
55−60
+5600%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−3100%
190−200
+3100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−1575%
65−70
+1575%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 30−35

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−2300%
24
+2300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 24−27
Far Cry 5 0−1 21−24

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 113
+0%
113
+0%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Metro Exodus 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 92
+0%
92
+0%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Metro Exodus 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 78
+0%
78
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 52
+0%
52
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Metro Exodus 97
+0%
97
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 101
+0%
101
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Hitman 3 36
+0%
36
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44
+0%
44
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14
+0%
14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 53
+0%
53
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21
+0%
21
+0%

This is how UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) and RX 6600 compete in popular games:

  • RX 6600 is 1189% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6600 is 2950% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6600 is 3000% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 6600 is 8400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6600 is ahead in 48 tests (71%)
  • there's a draw in 20 tests (29%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.39 39.26
Recency 11 January 2021 13 October 2021
Chip lithography 10 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 132 Watt

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) has 3200% lower power consumption.

RX 6600, on the other hand, has a 2724.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 months, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6600 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6600 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
AMD Radeon RX 6600
Radeon RX 6600

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 121 vote

Rate UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 9092 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.