GeForce RTX 4080 vs UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) with GeForce RTX 4080, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
2021
4 Watt
1.39

RTX 4080 outperforms UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) by a whopping 6355% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10023
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data28.93
Power efficiency10.0320.23
ArchitectureGen. 11 (2021)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGen. 11AD103
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date11 January 2021 (3 years ago)20 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores249728
Core clock speed350 MHz2205 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHz2505 MHz
Number of transistorsno data45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)4.8 - 10 Watt320 Watt
Texture fill rateno data761.5
Floating-point processing powerno data48.74 TFLOPS
ROPsno data112
TMUsno data304
Tensor Coresno data304
Ray Tracing Coresno data76

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data310 mm
Widthno data3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6X
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data716.8 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) 1.39
RTX 4080 89.73
+6355%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) 3411
RTX 4080 143194
+4098%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) 854
RTX 4080 86267
+10002%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) 645
RTX 4080 57903
+8877%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) 4911
RTX 4080 185431
+3676%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) 43610
RTX 4080 769721
+1665%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD9
−2600%
243
+2600%
1440p2−3
−8350%
169
+8350%
4K1−2
−10800%
109
+10800%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−5675%
231
+5675%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−2950%
180−190
+2950%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2900%
120−130
+2900%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−5675%
231
+5675%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−11700%
110−120
+11700%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−6600%
200−210
+6600%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−8800%
260−270
+8800%
Hitman 3 6−7
−2050%
120−130
+2050%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−2157%
300−350
+2157%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−6100%
120−130
+6100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−4950%
400−450
+4950%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−367%
150−160
+367%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−2950%
180−190
+2950%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2900%
120−130
+2900%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−5150%
210
+5150%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−11700%
110−120
+11700%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−6600%
200−210
+6600%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−8800%
260−270
+8800%
Hitman 3 6−7
−2050%
120−130
+2050%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−2157%
300−350
+2157%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−6100%
120−130
+6100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6
−8433%
512
+8433%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−1773%
200−210
+1773%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−367%
150−160
+367%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−2950%
180−190
+2950%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2900%
120−130
+2900%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−4650%
190
+4650%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−11700%
110−120
+11700%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−8800%
260−270
+8800%
Hitman 3 6−7
−2050%
120−130
+2050%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−2729%
396
+2729%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−5900%
480
+5900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−2255%
259
+2255%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−397%
164
+397%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−6100%
120−130
+6100%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−16500%
160−170
+16500%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−5500%
110−120
+5500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−11000%
110−120
+11000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 80−85
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−12800%
129
+12800%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−8300%
80−85
+8300%
Hitman 3 7−8
−1771%
130−140
+1771%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−6540%
332
+6540%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−19000%
191
+19000%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−3900%
240−250
+3900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−3125%
120−130
+3125%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 65−70

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−8000%
80−85
+8000%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−9900%
100
+9900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 50−55
Far Cry 5 0−1 50−55

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−3600%
110−120
+3600%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 262
+0%
262
+0%
Battlefield 5 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 217
+0%
217
+0%
Battlefield 5 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 189
+0%
189
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 153
+0%
153
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Metro Exodus 149
+0%
149
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 390
+0%
390
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Hitman 3 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Metro Exodus 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 187
+0%
187
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 63
+0%
63
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 195
+0%
195
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 87
+0%
87
+0%

This is how UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) and RTX 4080 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4080 is 2600% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4080 is 8350% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4080 is 10800% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4080 is 19000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 4080 is ahead in 48 tests (71%)
  • there's a draw in 20 tests (29%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.39 89.73
Recency 11 January 2021 20 September 2022
Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 320 Watt

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) has 7900% lower power consumption.

RTX 4080, on the other hand, has a 6355.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4080 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 4080 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
GeForce RTX 4080

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 121 vote

Rate UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4243 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4080 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.