RTX A4000 vs UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) with RTX A4000, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
2020
7 Watt
2.18

RTX A4000 outperforms UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) by a whopping 1909% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking84163
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency24.8024.91
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameLakefield GT2GA104
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date28 May 2020 (4 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores646144
Core clock speed200 MHz735 MHz
Boost clock speed500 MHz1560 MHz
Number of transistorsno data17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt140 Watt
Texture fill rateno data299.5
Floating-point processing powerno data19.17 TFLOPS
ROPsno data96
TMUsno data192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4GDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x DisplayPort 1.4a

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD13
−1900%
260−270
+1900%

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Atomic Heart 6−7
−1900%
120−130
+1900%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−1900%
100−105
+1900%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1900%
100−105
+1900%
Atomic Heart 6−7
−1900%
120−130
+1900%
Battlefield 5 7−8
−1900%
140−150
+1900%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−1900%
100−105
+1900%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1900%
100−105
+1900%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1900%
80−85
+1900%
Fortnite 10−12
−1900%
220−230
+1900%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1900%
240−250
+1900%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
−1900%
60−65
+1900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−1900%
240−250
+1900%
Valorant 40−45
−1805%
800−850
+1805%
Atomic Heart 6−7
−1900%
120−130
+1900%
Battlefield 5 7−8
−1900%
140−150
+1900%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−1900%
100−105
+1900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45−50
−1857%
900−950
+1857%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1900%
100−105
+1900%
Dota 2 15
−1900%
300−310
+1900%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1900%
80−85
+1900%
Fortnite 10−12
−1900%
220−230
+1900%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1900%
240−250
+1900%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
−1900%
60−65
+1900%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
−1900%
120−130
+1900%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−1900%
80−85
+1900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−1900%
240−250
+1900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−1900%
160−170
+1900%
Valorant 40−45
−1805%
800−850
+1805%
Battlefield 5 7−8
−1900%
140−150
+1900%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1900%
100−105
+1900%
Dota 2 15
−1900%
300−310
+1900%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1900%
80−85
+1900%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1900%
240−250
+1900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−1900%
240−250
+1900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−1900%
160−170
+1900%
Valorant 40−45
−1805%
800−850
+1805%
Fortnite 10−12
−1900%
220−230
+1900%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
−1665%
300−310
+1665%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−1805%
400−450
+1805%
Valorant 20−22
−1900%
400−450
+1900%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1900%
80−85
+1900%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−1900%
120−130
+1900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−1900%
80−85
+1900%
Fortnite 4−5
−1900%
80−85
+1900%
Atomic Heart 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−1900%
300−310
+1900%
Valorant 12−14
−1900%
240−250
+1900%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Dota 2 6−7
−1900%
120−130
+1900%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−1900%
60−65
+1900%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−1900%
60−65
+1900%
Fortnite 3−4
−1900%
60−65
+1900%

This is how UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) and RTX A4000 compete in popular games:

  • RTX A4000 is 1900% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.18 43.80
Recency 28 May 2020 12 April 2021
Chip lithography 10 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 140 Watt

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) has 1900% lower power consumption.

RTX A4000, on the other hand, has a 1909.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 months, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A4000 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is a notebook card while RTX A4000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
NVIDIA RTX A4000
RTX A4000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7
15 votes

Rate UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4
651 vote

Rate RTX A4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) or RTX A4000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.