Quadro NVS 120M vs UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)

UHD Graphics G1 UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics G1 32EU Mobile UHD Graphics G4 UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU) UHD Graphics G4 48EU Mobile UHD Graphics G7 UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) UHD Graphics G7 64EU Mobile
VS
Quadro NVS 110M Quadro NVS 120M Quadro NVS 130M Quadro NVS 135M Quadro NVS 140M Quadro NVS 150M Quadro NVS 160M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) with Quadro NVS 120M, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
2020
7 Watt
2.54
+2017%

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) outperforms NVS 120M by a whopping 2017% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
NVS 120M NVS 120M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking8391451
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency24.890.83
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameLakefield GT2G72
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date28 May 2020 (4 years ago)1 June 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores647
Core clock speed200 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed500 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistorsno data112 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1.800
ROPsno data2
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataMXM-III

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4DDR2
Maximum RAM amountno data512 MB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data700 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data11.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_19.0c (9_3)
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGLno data2.1
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD130−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Battlefield 5 7−8 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Far Cry 5 4−5 0−1
Fortnite 10−12 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
Valorant 40−45
+68%
24−27
−68%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Battlefield 5 7−8 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45−50
+370%
10−11
−370%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Dota 2 15
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%
Far Cry 5 4−5 0−1
Fortnite 10−12 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7 0−1
Metro Exodus 4−5 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Valorant 40−45
+68%
24−27
−68%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Dota 2 15
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%
Far Cry 5 4−5 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Valorant 40−45
+68%
24−27
−68%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−12 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
Valorant 21−24 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 2−3 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5 0−1

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 6−7 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is 1600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is ahead in 31 test (97%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (3%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 2.54 0.12
Recency 28 May 2020 1 June 2006
Chip lithography 10 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 10 Watt

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) has a 2016.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 800% more advanced lithography process, and 42.9% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 120M in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) is a notebook graphics card while Quadro NVS 120M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Intel UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 120M
Quadro NVS 120M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
vs
HD Graphics 530 HD Graphics 530
NVS 120M Quadro NVS 120M
vs
NVS 110M Quadro NVS 110M
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
vs
HD Graphics 620 HD Graphics 620
Tiger Lake-U G7 Intel Tiger Lake U G7
vs
RX 7600M XT RX 7600M XT
Graphics AMD Radeon Graphics
vs
Arc A730M Arc A730M
Graphics 384SP AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP
vs
Graphics 512SP Radeon Graphics 512SP
RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh
vs
RX 6600 XT 6600 XT
Graphics 512SP AMD Radeon Graphics 512SP
vs
Iris Xe MAX Graphics Xe MAX Graphics
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) Intel UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
vs
Tesla P4 Tesla P4
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) Intel UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
vs
UHD Graphics 750 UHD Graphics 750
RTX 2060 Mobile Refresh GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile Refresh
vs
RX 6700S 6700S
6600 AGP NVIDIA GeForce 6600 AGP
vs
ATI 9600 XT Radeon 9600 XT
Tegra 4i GPU NVIDIA Tegra 4i GPU
vs
RTX 3050 8 GB RTX 3050 8 GB

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.7 15 votes

Rate UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro NVS 120M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU) or Quadro NVS 120M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.