Radeon 780M vs UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU)

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated302
Place by popularitynot in top-10049
Power efficiencyno data83.68
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameLakefield GT1Phoenix
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date28 May 2020 (4 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48768
Core clock speed200 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed500 MHz2700 MHz
Number of transistorsno data25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data129.6
Floating-point processing powerno data8.294 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data48
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4System Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 May 2020 4 January 2023
Chip lithography 10 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 15 Watt

UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU) has 114.3% lower power consumption.

Radeon 780M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU) and Radeon 780M. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU)
UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU)
AMD Radeon 780M
Radeon 780M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 9 votes

Rate UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1563 votes

Rate Radeon 780M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.