RTX A500 vs UHD Graphics 770

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics 770 with RTX A500, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics 770
2022
15 Watt
6.17

RTX A500 outperforms UHD Graphics 770 by a whopping 184% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking583315
Place by popularity31not in top-100
Power efficiency28.3220.11
ArchitectureGeneration 12.2 (2022−2023)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameRaptor Lake GT1GA107
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date27 September 2022 (2 years ago)10 November 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2562048
Core clock speed300 MHz1440 MHz
Boost clock speed1650 MHz1770 MHz
Manufacturing process technology10 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate26.40113.3
Floating-point processing power0.8448 TFLOPS7.25 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs1664
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x8
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data112.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard DependentNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics 770 6.17
RTX A500 17.53
+184%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics 770 1016
RTX A500 6739
+563%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD19
−163%
50−55
+163%
4K14
−150%
35−40
+150%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−150%
35−40
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 12
−150%
30−33
+150%
Elden Ring 16−18
−181%
45−50
+181%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−163%
50−55
+163%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−150%
35−40
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 5
−180%
14−16
+180%
Forza Horizon 4 23
−183%
65−70
+183%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−167%
40−45
+167%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−178%
50−55
+178%
Valorant 16
−181%
45−50
+181%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−163%
50−55
+163%
Counter-Strike 2 6
−167%
16−18
+167%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Dota 2 20
−175%
55−60
+175%
Elden Ring 11
−173%
30−33
+173%
Far Cry 5 30
−183%
85−90
+183%
Fortnite 35−40
−178%
100−105
+178%
Forza Horizon 4 18
−178%
50−55
+178%
Grand Theft Auto V 9
−167%
24−27
+167%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−167%
40−45
+167%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
−175%
140−150
+175%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−178%
50−55
+178%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−163%
50−55
+163%
Valorant 18−20
−178%
50−55
+178%
World of Tanks 95−100
−176%
270−280
+176%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−163%
50−55
+163%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−150%
35−40
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Dota 2 40
−175%
110−120
+175%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−168%
75−80
+168%
Forza Horizon 4 16
−181%
45−50
+181%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
−175%
140−150
+175%
Valorant 18−20
−178%
50−55
+178%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
Elden Ring 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−170%
100−105
+170%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
World of Tanks 45−50
−167%
120−130
+167%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−169%
35−40
+169%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Valorant 16−18
−181%
45−50
+181%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
−165%
45−50
+165%
Elden Ring 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−165%
45−50
+165%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−178%
50−55
+178%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−165%
45−50
+165%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Dota 2 14
−150%
35−40
+150%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Fortnite 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
Valorant 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%

This is how UHD Graphics 770 and RTX A500 compete in popular games:

  • RTX A500 is 163% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A500 is 150% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.17 17.53
Recency 27 September 2022 10 November 2021
Chip lithography 10 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 60 Watt

UHD Graphics 770 has an age advantage of 10 months, and 300% lower power consumption.

RTX A500, on the other hand, has a 184.1% higher aggregate performance score, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A500 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 770 in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 770 is a desktop card while RTX A500 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 770
UHD Graphics 770
NVIDIA RTX A500
RTX A500

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 1283 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 139 votes

Rate RTX A500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.