Arc A530M vs UHD Graphics 770

Place in the ranking	574	309
Place by popularity	28	not in top-100
Power efficiency	28.39	18.52
Architecture	Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)	Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code name	Raptor Lake GT1	DG2-256
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	27 September 2022 (2 years ago)	1 August 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	256	1536
Core clock speed	300 MHz	900 MHz
Boost clock speed	1650 MHz	1300 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	11,500 million
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	65 Watt
Texture fill rate	26.40	124.8
Floating-point processing power	0.8448 TFLOPS	3.994 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	48
TMUs	16	96
Tensor Cores	no data	192
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	Ring Bus	PCIe 4.0 x8
Width	IGP	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	8 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	224.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

Motherboard Dependent

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.6	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics 770 6.15

Arc A530M 17.38
+183%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics 770 1016

Arc A530M 6708
+560%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	18 −178%	50−55 +178%
4K	13 −169%	35−40 +169%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

12
+500%

2−3

−500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 +433%	3−4 −433%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	13 −169%	35−40 +169%
Battlefield 5	16−18 −165%	45−50 +165%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +550%	2−3 −550%
Cyberpunk 2077	10 +400%	2−3 −400%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −150%	35−40 +150%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 −165%	45−50 +165%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −175%	110−120 +175%
Hitman 3	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +363%	8−9 −363%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −181%	45−50 +181%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 −165%	45−50 +165%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +425%	4−5 −425%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 +78.6%	27−30 −78.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 +433%	3−4 −433%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 −157%	18−20 +157%
Battlefield 5	16−18 −165%	45−50 +165%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +550%	2−3 −550%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −150%	35−40 +150%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 −165%	45−50 +165%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −175%	110−120 +175%
Hitman 3	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +363%	8−9 −363%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −181%	45−50 +181%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 −165%	45−50 +165%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18 +350%	4−5 −350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 +122%	9−10 −122%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 +78.6%	27−30 −78.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 +433%	3−4 −433%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 −157%	18−20 +157%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +550%	2−3 −550%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −150%	35−40 +150%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −175%	110−120 +175%
Hitman 3	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12 +50%	8−9 −50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16 +300%	4−5 −300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9 +0%	9−10 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 +78.6%	27−30 −78.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

16−18

−165%

45−50
+165%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −150%	30−33 +150%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 −167%	24−27 +167%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −167%	16−18 +167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −167%	16−18 +167%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4	0−1
Far Cry 5	7−8 −157%	18−20 +157%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −163%	50−55 +163%
Hitman 3	10−11 +66.7%	6−7 −66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +550%	2−3 −550%
Metro Exodus	5−6 −180%	14−16 +180%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −180%	14−16 +180%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −182%	110−120 +182%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−12
+450%

2−3

−450%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 −180%	14−16 +180%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Hitman 3	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −181%	45−50 +181%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −167%	16−18 +167%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	0−1	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7
+200%

2−3

−200%

This is how UHD Graphics 770 and Arc A530M compete in popular games:

Arc A530M is 178% faster in 1080p
Arc A530M is 169% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics 770 is 550% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

UHD Graphics 770 is ahead in 28 tests (97%)
there's a draw in 1 test (3%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	6.15	17.38
Recency	27 September 2022	1 August 2023
Chip lithography	10 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	65 Watt

UHD Graphics 770 has 333.3% lower power consumption.

Arc A530M, on the other hand, has a 182.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 months, and a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A530M is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 770 in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 770 is a desktop card while Arc A530M is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.