Qualcomm Adreno 690 vs UHD Graphics 750

Place in the ranking	669	811
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	20.75	26.92
Architecture	Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)	no data
GPU code name	Rocket Lake GT1	no data
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	30 March 2021 (3 years ago)	6 December 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	256	no data
Core clock speed	300 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1300 MHz	no data
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm+++	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	7 Watt
Texture fill rate	20.80	no data
Floating-point processing power	0.6656 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	8	no data
TMUs	16	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	Ring Bus	no data
Width	IGP	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	no data
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	no data
Memory bus width	System Shared	no data
Memory clock speed	System Shared	no data
Shared memory	no data	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	3.0	no data
Vulkan	1.2	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics 750 4.41
+65.2%

Qualcomm Adreno 690 2.67

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics 750 1733
+65.2%

Qualcomm Adreno 690 1049

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

30−35
+50%

−50%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2

12−14
+8.3%

12−14

−8.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 +117%	6−7 −117%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +8.3%	12−14 −8.3%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +46.2%	12−14 −46.2%
Forza Horizon 5	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%
Metro Exodus	10−11 +100%	5−6 −100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +40%	10−11 −40%
Valorant	12−14 +500%	2−3 −500%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 +117%	6−7 −117%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +8.3%	12−14 −8.3%
Dota 2	14−16 +0%	14 +0%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +43.8%	16 −43.8%
Fortnite	24−27 +73.3%	14−16 −73.3%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +46.2%	12−14 −46.2%
Forza Horizon 5	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 +100%	7−8 −100%
Metro Exodus	10−11 +100%	5−6 −100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 +56%	24−27 −56%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +40%	10−11 −40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +50%	10−11 −50%
Valorant	12−14 +500%	2−3 −500%
World of Tanks	75−80 +53.1%	45−50 −53.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 +117%	6−7 −117%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +8.3%	12−14 −8.3%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +43.8%	16−18 −43.8%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +46.2%	12−14 −46.2%
Forza Horizon 5	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 +56%	24−27 −56%
Valorant	12−14 +500%	2−3 −500%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +80%	5−6 −80%
Dota 2	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Grand Theft Auto V	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−33 +66.7%	18−20 −66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
World of Tanks	30−35 +77.8%	18−20 −77.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Far Cry 5	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Forza Horizon 5	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Metro Exodus	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
Valorant	12−14 +44.4%	9−10 −44.4%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 +6.3%	16−18 −6.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 +6.7%	14−16 −6.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 +62.5%	8−9 −62.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +6.7%	14−16 −6.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Far Cry 5	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Fortnite	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4	0−1
Forza Horizon 5	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Valorant	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%