Tesla PG500-216 vs UHD Graphics 730

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking685not rated
Place by popularity94not in top-100
Power efficiency19.34no data
ArchitectureGeneration 12.2 (2022−2023)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameRaptor Lake GT1GV100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date3 January 2023 (1 year ago)26 November 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1925120
Core clock speed300 MHz1260 MHz
Boost clock speed1550 MHz1380 MHz
Number of transistorsno data21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate18.60441.6
Floating-point processing power0.5952 TFLOPS14.13 TFLOPS
ROPs6128
TMUs12320
Tensor Coresno data640

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x16
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared32 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared4096 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1106 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1,133 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard DependentNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.66.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.31.2
CUDA-7.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 January 2023 26 November 2019
Chip lithography 10 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 250 Watt

UHD Graphics 730 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 1566.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 730 and Tesla PG500-216. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 730 is a desktop card while Tesla PG500-216 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 730
UHD Graphics 730
NVIDIA Tesla PG500-216
Tesla PG500-216

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1258 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 730 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Tesla PG500-216 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.