Quadro K2000M Embedded vs UHD Graphics 730

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking681not rated
Place by popularity94not in top-100
Power efficiency19.21no data
ArchitectureGeneration 12.2 (2022−2023)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameRaptor Lake GT1EXK107
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date3 January 2023 (1 year ago)22 March 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192384
Core clock speed300 MHz835 MHz
Boost clock speed1550 MHz1058 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate18.6033.86
Floating-point processing power0.5952 TFLOPS0.8125 TFLOPS
ROPs616
TMUs1232

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x16
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data57.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard Dependent1x DVI

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.0 (11_0)
Shader Model6.65.1
OpenGL4.64.1
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 January 2023 22 March 2012
Chip lithography 10 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 45 Watt

UHD Graphics 730 has an age advantage of 10 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 730 and Quadro K2000M Embedded. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 730 is a desktop card while Quadro K2000M Embedded is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 730
UHD Graphics 730
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M Embedded
Quadro K2000M Embedded

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1222 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 730 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro K2000M Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.