ATI Radeon HD 5670 vs UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)

Place in the ranking	372	878
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	0.26
Power efficiency	64.57	2.25
Architecture	no data	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code name	Rocket Lake GT1	Redwood
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	30 March 2021 (3 years ago)	14 January 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$119

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	no data	400
Core clock speed	no data	775 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	627 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	64 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	15.50
Floating-point processing power	no data	0.62 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	8
TMUs	no data	20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	no data	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	no data	168 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	no data	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	no data	1 GB
Memory bus width	no data	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	64 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	no data	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	no data	11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model	no data	5.0
OpenGL	no data	4.4
OpenCL	no data	1.2
Vulkan	-	N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) 14.07
+573%

ATI HD 5670 2.09

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) 11485
+682%

ATI HD 5670 1468

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) 1768

ATI HD 5670 6584
+272%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	170−180 +554%	26 −554%
Full HD	12 −167%	32 +167%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

no data

3.72

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	24−27 +150%	10−11 −150%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +460%	5−6 −460%
Elden Ring	40−45 +1333%	3−4 −1333%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 +1050%	4−5 −1050%
Counter-Strike 2	24−27 +150%	10−11 −150%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +460%	5−6 −460%
Forza Horizon 4	14 +27.3%	10−12 −27.3%
Metro Exodus	10 +400%	2−3 −400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 +338%	8−9 −338%
Valorant	55−60 +600%	8−9 −600%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 +1050%	4−5 −1050%
Counter-Strike 2	24−27 +150%	10−11 −150%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +460%	5−6 −460%
Dota 2	13 +225%	4−5 −225%
Elden Ring	40−45 +1333%	3−4 −1333%
Far Cry 5	18 +38.5%	12−14 −38.5%
Fortnite	75−80 +618%	10−12 −618%
Forza Horizon 4	12 +9.1%	10−12 −9.1%
Grand Theft Auto V	6 +50%	4−5 −50%
Metro Exodus	7 +250%	2−3 −250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	100−110 +410%	20−22 −410%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 +338%	8−9 −338%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 +378%	9−10 −378%
Valorant	55−60 +600%	8−9 −600%
World of Tanks	180−190 +365%	40−45 −365%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 +1050%	4−5 −1050%
Counter-Strike 2	24−27 +150%	10−11 −150%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +460%	5−6 −460%
Dota 2	25 +525%	4−5 −525%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +308%	12−14 −308%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 +418%	10−12 −418%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	100−110 +410%	20−22 −410%
Valorant	55−60 +600%	8−9 −600%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	20−22 +900%	2−3 −900%
Elden Ring	21−24 +2000%	1−2 −2000%
Grand Theft Auto V	20−22 +900%	2−3 −900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	110−120 +736%	14−16 −736%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +1100%	1−2 −1100%
World of Tanks	95−100 +662%	12−14 −662%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +33.3%	9−10 −33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +233%	3−4 −233%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +450%	6−7 −450%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +580%	5−6 −580%
Metro Exodus	30−33 +650%	4−5 −650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 +500%	3−4 −500%
Valorant	35−40 +338%	8−9 −338%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%
Dota 2	24−27 +56.3%	16−18 −56.3%
Elden Ring	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%
Grand Theft Auto V	24−27 +66.7%	14−16 −66.7%
Metro Exodus	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40−45 +583%	6−7 −583%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +66.7%	14−16 −66.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 +550%	2−3 −550%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Dota 2	24−27 +56.3%	16−18 −56.3%
Far Cry 5	18−20 +800%	2−3 −800%
Fortnite	16−18	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +850%	2−3 −850%
Valorant	14−16 +650%	2−3 −650%

This is how UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) and ATI HD 5670 compete in popular games:

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is 554% faster in 900p
ATI HD 5670 is 167% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Elden Ring, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is 2000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) surpassed ATI HD 5670 in all 50 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	14.07	2.09
Recency	30 March 2021	14 January 2010
Chip lithography	14 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	64 Watt

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) has a 573.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 326.7% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 5670 in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is a notebook card while Radeon HD 5670 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.