GeForce GT 220 vs UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)

Place in the ranking	373	1216
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	64.60	0.68
Architecture	no data	Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code name	Rocket Lake GT1	GT216
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	30 March 2021 (3 years ago)	12 October 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$79.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	no data	48
Core clock speed	no data	625 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	486 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	58 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	no data	105 °C
Texture fill rate	no data	9.840
Floating-point processing power	no data	0.1277 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	8
TMUs	no data	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	no data	PCI-E 2.0
Interface	no data	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	no data	168 mm
Height	no data	4.376" (11.1 cm)
Width	no data	1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	no data	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	no data	1 GB
Memory bus width	no data	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	790 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	25.3 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	no data	VGADVIHDMI
Multi monitor support	no data	+
HDMI	-	+
Maximum VGA resolution	no data	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	no data	S/PDIF + HDA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	no data	11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model	no data	4.1
OpenGL	no data	3.1
OpenCL	no data	1.1
Vulkan	-	N/A
CUDA	-	+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−75%

21
+75%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

no data

3.81

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	24−27 +178%	9−10 −178%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +833%	3−4 −833%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 +4500%	1−2 −4500%
Counter-Strike 2	24−27 +178%	9−10 −178%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +833%	3−4 −833%
Forza Horizon 4	14 +133%	6−7 −133%
Forza Horizon 5	35−40 +3600%	1−2 −3600%
Metro Exodus	10	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 +600%	5−6 −600%
Valorant	55−60 +2750%	2−3 −2750%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 +4500%	1−2 −4500%
Counter-Strike 2	24−27 +178%	9−10 −178%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +833%	3−4 −833%
Dota 2	13	0−1
Far Cry 5	18 +157%	7−8 −157%
Fortnite	75−80	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	12 +100%	6−7 −100%
Forza Horizon 5	35−40 +3600%	1−2 −3600%
Grand Theft Auto V	6	0−1
Metro Exodus	7	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	100−110 +1175%	8−9 −1175%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 +600%	5−6 −600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 +760%	5−6 −760%
Valorant	55−60 +2750%	2−3 −2750%
World of Tanks	180−190 +994%	16−18 −994%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 +4500%	1−2 −4500%
Counter-Strike 2	24−27 +178%	9−10 −178%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +833%	3−4 −833%
Dota 2	25 +2400%	1−2 −2400%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +657%	7−8 −657%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 +850%	6−7 −850%
Forza Horizon 5	35−40 +3600%	1−2 −3600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	100−110 +1175%	8−9 −1175%
Valorant	55−60 +2750%	2−3 −2750%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	20−22	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	21−24	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	110−120 +3800%	3−4 −3800%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14	0−1
World of Tanks	95−100 +9800%	1−2 −9800%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 +2700%	1−2 −2700%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +267%	3−4 −267%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +750%	4−5 −750%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +3300%	1−2 −3300%
Forza Horizon 5	21−24	0−1
Metro Exodus	30−33 +2900%	1−2 −2900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 +375%	4−5 −375%
Valorant	35−40 +600%	5−6 −600%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +100%	8−9 −100%
Dota 2	24−27 +66.7%	14−16 −66.7%
Grand Theft Auto V	24−27 +66.7%	14−16 −66.7%
Metro Exodus	9−10	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40−45 +4000%	1−2 −4000%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +66.7%	14−16 −66.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +100%	8−9 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Dota 2	24−27 +66.7%	14−16 −66.7%
Far Cry 5	18−20	0−1
Fortnite	16−18	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	20−22	0−1
Forza Horizon 5	10−12	0−1
Valorant	14−16 +1400%	1−2 −1400%

This is how UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) and GT 220 compete in popular games:

GT 220 is 75% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in World of Tanks, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is 9800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) surpassed GT 220 in all 34 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	13.54	0.55
Recency	30 March 2021	12 October 2009
Chip lithography	14 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	58 Watt

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) has a 2361.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 286.7% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 220 in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is a notebook card while GeForce GT 220 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.