A2 vs UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking369not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency66.38no data
Architectureno dataAmpere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameRocket Lake GT1GA107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date30 March 2021 (3 years ago)10 November 2021 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1280
Core clock speedno data1440 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1770 MHz
Manufacturing process technology14 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rateno data70.80
Floating-point processing powerno data4.531 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data40
Tensor Coresno data40
Ray Tracing Coresno data10

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1563 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data200.1 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.2
CUDA-8.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 March 2021 10 November 2021
Chip lithography 14 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 60 Watt

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) has 300% lower power consumption.

A2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) and A2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is a notebook card while A2 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
NVIDIA A2
A2

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 108 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 22 votes

Rate A2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.