GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q vs UHD Graphics 710

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking788not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.25no data
ArchitectureGeneration 12.2 (2022−2023)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameAlder Lake GT1AD107
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date4 January 2022 (2 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1282560
Core clock speed300 MHz1140 MHz
Boost clock speed1300 MHz1605 MHz
Manufacturing process technology10 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate10.40128.4
Floating-point processing power0.3328 TFLOPS8.218 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs880
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared6 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared96 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data168.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 January 2022 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 10 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

UHD Graphics 710 has 133.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 4050 Max-Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 710 and GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 710 is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 710
UHD Graphics 710
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 122 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 46 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.