Radeon Pro 5700 XT vs UHD Graphics 630

Place in the ranking	764	169
Place by popularity	35	not in top-100
Power efficiency	14.23	17.31
Architecture	Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code name	Comet Lake GT2	Navi 10
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	1 October 2017 (7 years ago)	4 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	184	2560
Core clock speed	350 MHz	1243 MHz
Boost clock speed	1150 MHz	1499 MHz
Number of transistors	189 million	10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm+++	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	130 Watt
Texture fill rate	26.45	239.8
Floating-point processing power	0.4232 TFLOPS	7.675 TFLOPS
ROPs	3	64
TMUs	23	160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 4.0 x16
Width	IGP	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	16 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	384.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.5	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.103	1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics 630 3.10

Pro 5700 XT 32.69
+955%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics 630 1192

Pro 5700 XT 12567
+954%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	16 −900%	160−170 +900%
1440p	10 −900%	100−110 +900%
4K	7 −900%	70−75 +900%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −900%	110−120 +900%
Cyberpunk 2077	5 −900%	50−55 +900%
Elden Ring	6−7 −900%	60−65 +900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	8 −900%	80−85 +900%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −900%	110−120 +900%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −900%	70−75 +900%
Forza Horizon 4	13 −900%	130−140 +900%
Metro Exodus	8 −900%	80−85 +900%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9 −900%	90−95 +900%
Valorant	8 −900%	80−85 +900%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 −900%	80−85 +900%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −900%	110−120 +900%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −900%	70−75 +900%
Dota 2	11 −900%	110−120 +900%
Elden Ring	6−7 −900%	60−65 +900%
Far Cry 5	13 −900%	130−140 +900%
Fortnite	16−18 −900%	170−180 +900%
Forza Horizon 4	12 −900%	120−130 +900%
Grand Theft Auto V	7 −900%	70−75 +900%
Metro Exodus	6−7 −900%	60−65 +900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	33 −809%	300−310 +809%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 −900%	110−120 +900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5 −900%	50−55 +900%
Valorant	2−3 −950%	21−24 +950%
World of Tanks	29 −934%	300−310 +934%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 −900%	80−85 +900%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −900%	110−120 +900%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −900%	70−75 +900%
Dota 2	19 −953%	200−210 +953%
Far Cry 5	10 −900%	100−105 +900%
Forza Horizon 4	11 −900%	110−120 +900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27−30 −936%	290−300 +936%
Valorant	2−3 −950%	21−24 +950%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
Elden Ring	3−4 −900%	30−33 +900%
Grand Theft Auto V	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	21−24 −945%	230−240 +945%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −950%	21−24 +950%
World of Tanks	21−24 −948%	220−230 +948%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −900%	30−33 +900%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −900%	90−95 +900%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −900%	30−33 +900%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −900%	70−75 +900%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −900%	40−45 +900%
Valorant	10−11 −900%	100−105 +900%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −900%	160−170 +900%
Elden Ring	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −900%	150−160 +900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	9−10 −900%	90−95 +900%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −950%	21−24 +950%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −900%	160−170 +900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −950%	21−24 +950%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
Dota 2	7 −900%	70−75 +900%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −900%	30−33 +900%
Fortnite	2−3 −950%	21−24 +950%
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	0−1
Valorant	3−4 −900%	30−33 +900%

This is how UHD Graphics 630 and Pro 5700 XT compete in popular games:

Pro 5700 XT is 900% faster in 1080p
Pro 5700 XT is 900% faster in 1440p
Pro 5700 XT is 900% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	3.10	32.69
Recency	1 October 2017	4 August 2020
Chip lithography	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	130 Watt

UHD Graphics 630 has 766.7% lower power consumption.

Pro 5700 XT, on the other hand, has a 954.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 630 in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 630 is a desktop card while Radeon Pro 5700 XT is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.