ATI Radeon HD 4250 vs UHD Graphics 630

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics 630 and Radeon HD 4250, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

UHD Graphics 630
2017
15 Watt
3.10
+869%

UHD Graphics 630 outperforms ATI HD 4250 by a whopping 869% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking7641315
Place by popularity35not in top-100
Power efficiency14.230.88
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameComet Lake GT2RV620
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 October 2017 (7 years ago)25 February 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores18440
Core clock speed350 MHz594 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million181 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+++55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate26.452.376
Floating-point processing power0.4232 TFLOPS0.04752 TFLOPS
ROPs34
TMUs234

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 2.0 x16
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared396 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data6.336 GB/s
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.54.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.1N/A
Vulkan1.1.103N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics 630 3.10
+869%
ATI HD 4250 0.32

  • Other tests
    • Passmark
    • 3DMark Vantage Performance

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics 630 1192
+877%
ATI HD 4250 122

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

UHD Graphics 630 7704
+3294%
ATI HD 4250 227

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD15
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
1440p10
+900%
1−2
−900%
4K70−1

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 5
+150%
2−3
−150%
Elden Ring 6−7 0−1
Battlefield 5 8 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Forza Horizon 4 13
+160%
5−6
−160%
Metro Exodus 8 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 9
+125%
4−5
−125%
Valorant 8 0−1
Battlefield 5 8−9 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Dota 2 11
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Elden Ring 6−7 0−1
Far Cry 5 13
+117%
6−7
−117%
Fortnite 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
Forza Horizon 4 12
+140%
5−6
−140%
Grand Theft Auto V 7 0−1
Metro Exodus 6−7 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 33
+450%
6−7
−450%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 2−3 0−1
World of Tanks 29
+123%
12−14
−123%
Battlefield 5 8−9 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Dota 2 19
+1800%
1−2
−1800%
Far Cry 5 10
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 11
+120%
5−6
−120%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+367%
6−7
−367%
Valorant 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 1−2 0−1
Elden Ring 3−4 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+1000%
2−3
−1000%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3 0−1
World of Tanks 21−24
+950%
2−3
−950%
Battlefield 5 3−4 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Valorant 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Dota 2 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Elden Ring 1−2 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Battlefield 5 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 7
−114%
14−16
+114%
Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
Fortnite 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
Valorant 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

This is how UHD Graphics 630 and ATI HD 4250 compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 630 is 1400% faster in 1080p
  • UHD Graphics 630 is 900% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics 630 is 1000% faster.
  • in Dota 2, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the ATI HD 4250 is 114% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 630 is ahead in 27 tests (84%)
  • ATI HD 4250 is ahead in 1 test (3%)
  • there's a draw in 4 tests (13%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.10 0.32
Recency 1 October 2017 25 February 2009
Chip lithography 14 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 25 Watt

UHD Graphics 630 has a 868.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 292.9% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics 630 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 4250 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 630
UHD Graphics 630
ATI Radeon HD 4250
Radeon HD 4250

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3
4019 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1
83 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.