GeForce GT 130M vs UHD Graphics 630

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking762not rated
Place by popularity48not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 9.5 (2017)G9x (2007−2010)
GPU code nameKaby-Lake-H-GT2N10P-GE1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 October 2017 (6 years ago)8 January 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2432
CUDA coresno data32
Core clock speed300 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate26.459.600
Floating-point performance0.4232 gflops0.096 gflops
Gigaflopsno data144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 2.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
SLI options-2-way

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR2, GDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedUp to 1 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data500 (DDR2)/800 (GDDR3) MHz
Memory bandwidthno data16 (DDR2)/25 (GDDR3)
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsSingle Link DVIDisplayPortVGAHDMIDual Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power managementno data8.0
Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.54.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL2.11.1
Vulkan1.1.103N/A
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics 630 1192
+716%
GT 130M 146

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

UHD Graphics 630 7704
+373%
GT 130M 1629

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2017 8 January 2009
Chip lithography 14 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 23 Watt

UHD Graphics 630 has an age advantage of 8 years, a 292.9% more advanced lithography process, and 53.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 630 and GeForce GT 130M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 630 is a desktop card while GeForce GT 130M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 630
UHD Graphics 630
NVIDIA GeForce GT 130M
GeForce GT 130M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 3732 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 22 votes

Rate GeForce GT 130M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.