Xe DG1 vs UHD Graphics 620

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking802not rated
Place by popularity24not in top-100
Power efficiency12.38no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameKaby Lake GT2DG1
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 September 2017 (7 years ago)2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192640
Core clock speed300 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz1550 MHz
Number of transistors189 million5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm++10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate24.0062.00
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPS1.984 TFLOPS
ROPs320
TMUs2440

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data164 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR3/DDR4LPDDR4X
Maximum RAM amount32 GB4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2133 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data68.26 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 30 Watt

UHD Graphics 620 has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 100% lower power consumption.

Xe DG1, on the other hand, has a 40% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 620 and Xe DG1. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 620
UHD Graphics 620
Intel Xe DG1
Xe DG1

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 4329 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 22 votes

Rate Xe DG1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.