GeForce GTX 750 v2 vs UHD Graphics 620

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking808not rated
Place by popularity27not in top-100
Power efficiency12.39no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameKaby Lake GT2GM206
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 September 2017 (7 years ago)17 November 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192512
Core clock speed300 MHz1038 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz1188 MHz
Number of transistors189 million2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm++28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate24.0038.02
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPS1.217 TFLOPS
ROPs332
TMUs2432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR3/DDR4GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount32 GB2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared5012 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80.19 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2017 17 November 2015
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm

UHD Graphics 620 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 620 and GeForce GTX 750 v2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 620 is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 750 v2 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 620
UHD Graphics 620
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 v2
GeForce GTX 750 v2

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 4397 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 49 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 750 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.