GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 vs UHD Graphics 620

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics 620 and GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

UHD Graphics 620
2017
32 GB LPDDR3/DDR4, 15 Watt
2.67

GTS 450 Rev. 2 outperforms UHD Graphics 620 by an impressive 65% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking802661
Place by popularity23not in top-100
Power efficiency12.843.00
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameKaby Lake GT2GF116
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 September 2017 (7 years ago)15 March 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192192
Core clock speed300 MHz783 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm++40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt106 Watt
Texture fill rate24.0025.06
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPS0.6013 TFLOPS
ROPs316
TMUs2432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data210 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR3/DDR4GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount32 GB1 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared902 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data57.73 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.1
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA-2.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD13
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%
1440p15
−60%
24−27
+60%
4K8
−50%
12−14
+50%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6
−50%
9−10
+50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8
−50%
12−14
+50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Battlefield 5 8
−50%
12−14
+50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6
−50%
9−10
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Far Cry New Dawn 10
−60%
16−18
+60%
Forza Horizon 4 38
−57.9%
60−65
+57.9%
Hitman 3 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40
−62.5%
65−70
+62.5%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 15
−60%
24−27
+60%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30
−50%
45−50
+50%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Battlefield 5 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 36
−52.8%
55−60
+52.8%
Hitman 3 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 34
−61.8%
55−60
+61.8%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 11
−63.6%
18−20
+63.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
−50%
21−24
+50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−57.9%
60−65
+57.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%
Hitman 3 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5
−60%
8−9
+60%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14
−50%
21−24
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−57.9%
60−65
+57.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Hitman 3 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%

This is how UHD Graphics 620 and GTS 450 Rev. 2 compete in popular games:

  • GTS 450 Rev. 2 is 62% faster in 1080p
  • GTS 450 Rev. 2 is 60% faster in 1440p
  • GTS 450 Rev. 2 is 50% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.67 4.41
Recency 1 September 2017 15 March 2011
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 106 Watt

UHD Graphics 620 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 606.7% lower power consumption.

GTS 450 Rev. 2, on the other hand, has a 65.2% higher aggregate performance score.

The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 620 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 620
UHD Graphics 620
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 4318 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 39 votes

Rate GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.