ATI FirePro V8800 vs UHD Graphics 620

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking810not rated
Place by popularity26not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 9.5 (2017)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameKaby-Lake-Refresh GT2Cypress
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 September 2017 (7 years ago)7 April 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,499

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores241600
Core clock speed300 MHz825 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million2,154 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt208 Watt
Texture fill rate27.6066.00
Floating-point performance0.4416 gflops2.64 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR3/DDR4GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount32 GB2 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data4600 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data147.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.1.103N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2017 7 April 2010
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 208 Watt

UHD Graphics 620 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 1286.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 620 and FirePro V8800. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 620 is a notebook card while FirePro V8800 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 620
UHD Graphics 620
ATI FirePro V8800
FirePro V8800

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 4114 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 2 votes

Rate FirePro V8800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.