TITAN V CEO Edition vs UHD Graphics 610

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics 610 and TITAN V CEO Edition, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

UHD Graphics 610
2018
15 Watt
1.89

TITAN V CEO Edition outperforms UHD Graphics 610 by a whopping 2229% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking90383
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.0912.70
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameCoffee Lake GT1GV100
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date3 April 2018 (6 years ago)21 June 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores965120
Core clock speed300 MHz1200 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHz1455 MHz
Number of transistors189 million21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+++12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate10.80465.6
Floating-point processing power0.1728 TFLOPS14.9 TFLOPS
ROPs2128
TMUs12320
Tensor Coresno data640

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared32 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared4096 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared848 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data868.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.31.2.131
CUDA-7.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics 610 1.89
TITAN V CEO Edition 44.02
+2229%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics 610 728
TITAN V CEO Edition 16987
+2233%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD9
−2122%
200−210
+2122%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2150%
90−95
+2150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−2067%
130−140
+2067%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2150%
90−95
+2150%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2150%
90−95
+2150%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%
Hitman 3 6−7
−2067%
130−140
+2067%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−2043%
300−310
+2043%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8
−2150%
180−190
+2150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−2150%
180−190
+2150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−2173%
750−800
+2173%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−2067%
130−140
+2067%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2150%
90−95
+2150%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2150%
90−95
+2150%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%
Hitman 3 6−7
−2067%
130−140
+2067%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−2043%
300−310
+2043%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10
−2200%
230−240
+2200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−2173%
250−260
+2173%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−2173%
750−800
+2173%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−2067%
130−140
+2067%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2150%
90−95
+2150%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2150%
90−95
+2150%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%
Hitman 3 6−7
−2067%
130−140
+2067%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−2043%
300−310
+2043%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14
−2043%
300−310
+2043%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−2173%
250−260
+2173%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−2173%
750−800
+2173%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Hitman 3 7−8
−2186%
160−170
+2186%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−2100%
110−120
+2100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−2067%
130−140
+2067%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−2150%
90−95
+2150%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%

This is how UHD Graphics 610 and TITAN V CEO Edition compete in popular games:

  • TITAN V CEO Edition is 2122% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.89 44.02
Recency 3 April 2018 21 June 2018
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 250 Watt

UHD Graphics 610 has 1566.7% lower power consumption.

TITAN V CEO Edition, on the other hand, has a 2229.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 months, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The TITAN V CEO Edition is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 610 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 610
UHD Graphics 610
NVIDIA TITAN V CEO Edition
TITAN V CEO Edition

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 625 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 610 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 20 votes

Rate TITAN V CEO Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.