Radeon Vega 6 Embedded vs UHD Graphics 605

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1067not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency16.31no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGemini Lake GT1.5Raven
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date11 December 2017 (6 years ago)10 May 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores144384
Core clock speed200 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed750 MHz1280 MHz
Number of transistors189 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)5 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate13.5030.72
Floating-point processing power0.216 TFLOPS0.983 TFLOPS
ROPs38
TMUs1824

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusIGP
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.0
Vulkan1.31.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 December 2017 10 May 2018
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 15 Watt

UHD Graphics 605 has 200% lower power consumption.

Vega 6 Embedded, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 605 and Radeon Vega 6 Embedded. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 605 is a notebook card while Radeon Vega 6 Embedded is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 605
UHD Graphics 605
AMD Radeon Vega 6 Embedded
Radeon Vega 6 Embedded

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 804 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 605 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 5 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 6 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.