RTX A4500 vs UHD Graphics 605

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics 605 with RTX A4500, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics 605
2017
5 Watt
1.17

RTX A4500 outperforms UHD Graphics 605 by a whopping 4694% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking106545
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency16.3119.55
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGemini Lake GT1.5GA102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date11 December 2017 (6 years ago)23 November 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1447168
Core clock speed200 MHz1050 MHz
Boost clock speed750 MHz1650 MHz
Number of transistors189 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)5 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate13.50369.6
Floating-point processing power0.216 TFLOPS23.65 TFLOPS
ROPs396
TMUs18224
Tensor Coresno data224
Ray Tracing Coresno data56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared20 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared320 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data640.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x DisplayPort 1.4a

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics 605 1.17
RTX A4500 56.09
+4694%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics 605 453
RTX A4500 21639
+4677%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD12
−4483%
550−600
+4483%
4K15
−4567%
700−750
+4567%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−4567%
140−150
+4567%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−4500%
230−240
+4500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−4650%
190−200
+4650%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−4567%
140−150
+4567%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−4567%
140−150
+4567%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Hitman 3 6−7
−4567%
280−290
+4567%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−4543%
650−700
+4543%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−4650%
95−100
+4650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−4275%
350−400
+4275%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−4588%
1500−1550
+4588%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−4500%
230−240
+4500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−4650%
190−200
+4650%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−4567%
140−150
+4567%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−4567%
140−150
+4567%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Hitman 3 6−7
−4567%
280−290
+4567%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−4543%
650−700
+4543%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−4650%
95−100
+4650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−4275%
350−400
+4275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−4445%
500−550
+4445%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−4588%
1500−1550
+4588%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−4500%
230−240
+4500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−4650%
190−200
+4650%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−4567%
140−150
+4567%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Hitman 3 6−7
−4567%
280−290
+4567%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−4543%
650−700
+4543%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−4275%
350−400
+4275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−4588%
1500−1550
+4588%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−4650%
95−100
+4650%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−4650%
95−100
+4650%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Hitman 3 7−8
−4186%
300−310
+4186%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−4650%
190−200
+4650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
−4500%
230−240
+4500%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−4650%
190−200
+4650%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−4650%
95−100
+4650%

This is how UHD Graphics 605 and RTX A4500 compete in popular games:

  • RTX A4500 is 4483% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A4500 is 4567% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.17 56.09
Recency 11 December 2017 23 November 2021
Chip lithography 14 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 200 Watt

UHD Graphics 605 has 3900% lower power consumption.

RTX A4500, on the other hand, has a 4694% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A4500 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 605 in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 605 is a notebook card while RTX A4500 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 605
UHD Graphics 605
NVIDIA RTX A4500
RTX A4500

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 804 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 605 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 190 votes

Rate RTX A4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.