ATI Mobility Radeon X2300 vs UHD Graphics 600

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1126not rated
Place by popularity50not in top-100
Power efficiency12.04no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameGemini Lake GT1M64
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date11 December 2017 (6 years ago)1 March 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores966
Core clock speed200 MHz479 MHz
Boost clock speed650 MHz480 MHz
Number of transistors189 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)5 Wattno data
Texture fill rate7.8001.916
Floating-point processing power0.1248 TFLOPSno data
ROPs24
TMUs124

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 1.0 x16
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared64 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared392 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data6.272 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.43.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan+N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 December 2017 1 March 2007
Chip lithography 14 nm 80 nm

UHD Graphics 600 has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 600 and Mobility Radeon X2300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 600 is a desktop card while Mobility Radeon X2300 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 600
UHD Graphics 600
ATI Mobility Radeon X2300
Mobility Radeon X2300

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 3495 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 56 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon X2300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.