Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) with Iris Pro Graphics P6300, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
2023
2.32

Iris Pro Graphics P6300 outperforms UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) by an impressive 78% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking847684
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data19.10
ArchitectureGen. 12 (2021−2023)Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)
GPU code nameAlder Lake XeBroadwell GT3e
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 January 2023 (1 year ago)5 September 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores24384
Core clock speed450 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed750 MHz800 MHz
Number of transistorsno data189 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data38.40
Floating-point processing powerno data0.6144 TFLOPS
ROPsno data6
TMUsno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataIGP
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.4
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.1.80

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8
−75%
14−16
+75%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−75%
14−16
+75%
Battlefield 5 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−63.6%
18−20
+63.6%
Hitman 3 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−57.9%
30−33
+57.9%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−63.6%
18−20
+63.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−75.7%
65−70
+75.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−75%
14−16
+75%
Battlefield 5 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−63.6%
18−20
+63.6%
Hitman 3 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−57.9%
30−33
+57.9%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10
−60%
16−18
+60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−75.7%
65−70
+75.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−75%
14−16
+75%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−63.6%
18−20
+63.6%
Hitman 3 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−57.9%
30−33
+57.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12
−75%
21−24
+75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4
−75%
7−8
+75%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−75.7%
65−70
+75.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Hitman 3 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%

This is how UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) and Iris Pro Graphics P6300 compete in popular games:

  • Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is 75% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.32 4.14
Recency 3 January 2023 5 September 2014
Chip lithography 10 nm 14 nm

UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

Iris Pro Graphics P6300, on the other hand, has a 78.4% higher aggregate performance score.

The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) is a notebook card while Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
Iris Pro Graphics P6300

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 73 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 13 votes

Rate Iris Pro Graphics P6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.