GMA vs UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) and GMA, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
2023
2.26
+22500%

UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) outperforms GMA by a whopping 22500% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking8581544
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 12 (2021−2023)PowerVR SGX545 (2008−2010)
GPU code nameAlder Lake XeCloverview
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 January 2023 (2 years ago)4 May 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores24no data
Core clock speed450 MHz533 MHz
Boost clock speed750 MHzno data
Manufacturing process technology10 nm32 nm
Texture fill rateno data1.066
ROPsno data1
TMUsno data2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_19.0c
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGLno dataES 2.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD7-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 8−9 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 10 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
Metro Exodus 7 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10 0−1
Valorant 0−1 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 4 0−1
Dota 2 5 0−1
Far Cry 5 12 0−1
Fortnite 12−14 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 10 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 5 0−1
Metro Exodus 5 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10 0−1
Valorant 0−1 0−1
World of Tanks 40−45 0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 8−9 0−1
Far Cry 5 14−16 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 11 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24 0−1
Valorant 0−1 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 0−1 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2 0−1
World of Tanks 14−16 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 6−7 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 2−3 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 0−1
Valorant 8−9 0−1

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Fortnite 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
Valorant 2−3 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.26 0.01
Recency 3 January 2023 4 May 2010
Chip lithography 10 nm 32 nm

UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) has a 22500% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) is our recommended choice as it beats the GMA in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
Intel GMA
GMA

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 81 vote

Rate UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 9 votes

Rate GMA on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) or GMA, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.