UHD Graphics 620 vs Titan X Pascal

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Titan X Pascal with UHD Graphics 620, including specs and performance data.

Titan X Pascal
2016
12 GB GDDR5X, 250 Watt
33.81
+1166%

Titan X Pascal outperforms UHD Graphics 620 by a whopping 1166% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking157810
Place by popularitynot in top-10027
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.91no data
Power efficiency9.2712.20
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGP102Kaby Lake GT2
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date2 August 2016 (8 years ago)1 September 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3584192
Core clock speed1417 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1531 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm14 nm++
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate342.924.00
Floating-point processing power10.97 TFLOPS0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs963
TMUs22424

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Ring Bus
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XLPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount12 GB32 GB
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1251 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth480.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Titan X Pascal 33.81
+1166%
UHD Graphics 620 2.67

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Titan X Pascal 13026
+1165%
UHD Graphics 620 1030

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Titan X Pascal 35981
+1963%
UHD Graphics 620 1744

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Titan X Pascal 100948
+1277%
UHD Graphics 620 7330

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Titan X Pascal 27349
+2242%
UHD Graphics 620 1168

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Titan X Pascal 136891
+1368%
UHD Graphics 620 9324

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Titan X Pascal 514513
+480%
UHD Graphics 620 88746

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

Titan X Pascal 124
+856%
UHD Graphics 620 13

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

Titan X Pascal 65
+170%
UHD Graphics 620 24

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

Titan X Pascal 108
+3889%
UHD Graphics 620 3

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

Titan X Pascal 92
+566%
UHD Graphics 620 14

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

Titan X Pascal 60
+362%
UHD Graphics 620 13

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

Titan X Pascal 70
+2307%
UHD Graphics 620 3

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

Titan X Pascal 132
+1837%
UHD Graphics 620 7

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

Titan X Pascal 16
+8050%
UHD Graphics 620 0

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

Titan X Pascal 132
+1837%
UHD Graphics 620 7

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.

Titan X Pascal 97
+647%
UHD Graphics 620 13

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

Titan X Pascal 92
+566%
UHD Graphics 620 14

SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks

Titan X Pascal 63
+161%
UHD Graphics 620 24

SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX

Titan X Pascal 108
+3889%
UHD Graphics 620 3

SPECviewperf 12 - Creo

Titan X Pascal 60
+362%
UHD Graphics 620 13

SPECviewperf 12 - Medical

Titan X Pascal 70
+2307%
UHD Graphics 620 3

SPECviewperf 12 - Energy

Titan X Pascal 16.5
+8150%
UHD Graphics 620 0.2

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05

Titan X Pascal 152
+1068%
UHD Graphics 620 13

SPECviewperf 12 - 3ds Max

This part of SPECviewperf 12 benchmark emulates work with 3DS Max, executing eleven tests in various use scenarios, including architectural modeling and animation for computer games.

Titan X Pascal 152
+1068%
UHD Graphics 620 13

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD126
+869%
13
−869%
1440p72
+380%
15
−380%
4K56
+700%
7
−700%

Cost per frame, $

1080p9.52no data
1440p16.65no data
4K21.41no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 79
+1217%
6
−1217%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 104
+1200%
8
−1200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 95 0−1
Battlefield 5 174
+2075%
8
−2075%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 108
+1700%
6
−1700%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+1460%
5−6
−1460%
Far Cry 5 121
+2320%
5−6
−2320%
Far Cry New Dawn 138
+1280%
10
−1280%
Forza Horizon 4 240
+532%
38
−532%
Hitman 3 104
+1386%
7−8
−1386%
Horizon Zero Dawn 296
+640%
40
−640%
Metro Exodus 143
+7050%
2−3
−7050%
Red Dead Redemption 2 125
+1289%
9
−1289%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 161
+973%
15
−973%
Watch Dogs: Legion 226
+653%
30
−653%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 121
+1244%
9−10
−1244%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 85 0−1
Battlefield 5 165
+4025%
4−5
−4025%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 98
+1300%
7−8
−1300%
Cyberpunk 2077 69
+1280%
5−6
−1280%
Far Cry 5 92
+1740%
5−6
−1740%
Far Cry New Dawn 108
+1443%
7−8
−1443%
Forza Horizon 4 225
+525%
36
−525%
Hitman 3 104
+1386%
7−8
−1386%
Horizon Zero Dawn 275
+709%
34
−709%
Metro Exodus 143
+7050%
2−3
−7050%
Red Dead Redemption 2 102
+1600%
6−7
−1600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 194
+1664%
11
−1664%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 96
+586%
14
−586%
Watch Dogs: Legion 216
+468%
35−40
−468%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 67
+644%
9−10
−644%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 63 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75
+971%
7−8
−971%
Cyberpunk 2077 59
+1080%
5−6
−1080%
Far Cry 5 67
+1240%
5−6
−1240%
Forza Horizon 4 112
+762%
12−14
−762%
Hitman 3 93
+1229%
7−8
−1229%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150
+2900%
5
−2900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 167
+1093%
14
−1093%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95
+3067%
3
−3067%
Watch Dogs: Legion 64
+68.4%
35−40
−68.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 118
+1867%
6−7
−1867%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+1500%
4−5
−1500%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+1175%
4−5
−1175%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+1700%
2−3
−1700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 51
+1175%
4−5
−1175%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 58
+2800%
2−3
−2800%
Cyberpunk 2077 38
+3700%
1−2
−3700%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+1200%
3−4
−1200%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+1279%
14−16
−1279%
Hitman 3 66
+725%
8−9
−725%
Horizon Zero Dawn 118
+1586%
7−8
−1586%
Metro Exodus 101
+1343%
7−8
−1343%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 122
+1256%
9−10
−1256%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+2200%
2−3
−2200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 212
+1225%
16−18
−1225%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 92
+1433%
6−7
−1433%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 63
+6200%
1−2
−6200%
Far Cry New Dawn 48
+4700%
1−2
−4700%
Hitman 3 39
+1200%
3−4
−1200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 129
+1190%
10−11
−1190%
Metro Exodus 67
+1240%
5−6
−1240%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 68
+1260%
5−6
−1260%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 38
+1800%
2−3
−1800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 32
+3100%
1−2
−3100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 34
+3300%
1−2
−3300%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Far Cry 5 33
+3200%
1−2
−3200%
Forza Horizon 4 73
+1360%
5−6
−1360%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 70
+1300%
5−6
−1300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 26 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 47
+1075%
4−5
−1075%

This is how Titan X Pascal and UHD Graphics 620 compete in popular games:

  • Titan X Pascal is 869% faster in 1080p
  • Titan X Pascal is 380% faster in 1440p
  • Titan X Pascal is 700% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Titan X Pascal is 7050% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Titan X Pascal surpassed UHD Graphics 620 in all 57 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.81 2.67
Recency 2 August 2016 1 September 2017
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 15 Watt

Titan X Pascal has a 1166.3% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics 620, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 1566.7% lower power consumption.

The Titan X Pascal is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 620 in performance tests.

Be aware that Titan X Pascal is a desktop card while UHD Graphics 620 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Titan X Pascal
Intel UHD Graphics 620
UHD Graphics 620

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 3000 votes

Rate Titan X Pascal on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 4477 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.