ATI Radeon 9000 PRO vs Titan X Pascal

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking153not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.87no data
Power efficiency9.35no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameGP102RV250
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2 August 2016 (8 years ago)1 July 2002 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3584no data
Core clock speed1417 MHz275 MHz
Boost clock speed1531 MHzno data
Number of transistors11,800 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate342.91.100
Floating-point processing power10.97 TFLOPSno data
ROPs964
TMUs2244

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 4x
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XDDR
Maximum RAM amount12 GB64 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1251 MHz275 MHz
Memory bandwidth480.4 GB/s8.8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)8.1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 August 2016 1 July 2002
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 16 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 28 Watt

Titan X Pascal has an age advantage of 14 years, a 19100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 837.5% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9000 PRO, on the other hand, has 792.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Titan X Pascal and Radeon 9000 PRO. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Titan X Pascal
ATI Radeon 9000 PRO
Radeon 9000 PRO

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 2994 votes

Rate Titan X Pascal on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 13 votes

Rate Radeon 9000 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.