Arc A370M vs Tesla X2090

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated380
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data26.24
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGF110DG2-128
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date25 July 2011 (13 years ago)30 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5121024
Core clock speed651 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1550 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate41.6699.20
Floating-point processing power1.332 TFLOPS3.174 TFLOPS
ROPs4832
TMUs6464
Ray Tracing Coresno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
WidthMXM Moduleno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed924 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth177.4 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA2.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2011 30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 35 Watt

Tesla X2090 has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Arc A370M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 566.7% more advanced lithography process, and 542.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla X2090 and Arc A370M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla X2090 is a workstation card while Arc A370M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla X2090
Tesla X2090
Intel Arc A370M
Arc A370M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate Tesla X2090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 163 votes

Rate Arc A370M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.