Radeon Pro Vega II vs Tesla V100 FHHL

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated99
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data16.38
Power efficiencyno data5.89
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGV100Vega 20
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date27 March 2018 (6 years ago)3 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51204096
Core clock speed937 MHz1574 MHz
Boost clock speed1290 MHz1720 MHz
Number of transistors21,100 million13,230 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt475 Watt
Texture fill rate412.8440.3
Floating-point processing power13.21 TFLOPS14.09 TFLOPS
ROPs12864
TMUs320256
Tensor Cores640no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Apple MPX
Width1-slotQuad-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2HBM2
Maximum RAM amount16 GB32 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed810 MHz806 MHz
Memory bandwidth829.4 GB/s825.3 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.0b, 4x Thunderbolt
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 March 2018 3 June 2019
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 475 Watt

Tesla V100 FHHL has 90% lower power consumption.

Pro Vega II, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Tesla V100 FHHL and Radeon Pro Vega II. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla V100 FHHL
Tesla V100 FHHL
AMD Radeon Pro Vega II
Radeon Pro Vega II

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 9 votes

Rate Tesla V100 FHHL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 80 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega II on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.