GMA X4500 vs Tesla V100 FHHL

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)Generation 5.0 (2008)
GPU code nameGV100Eaglelake
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date27 March 2018 (6 years ago)1 June 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512080
Core clock speed937 MHz533 MHz
Boost clock speed1290 MHzno data
Number of transistors21,100 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate412.82.132
Floating-point performance13.21 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width4096 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1620 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth829.4 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)10.0
Shader Model6.44.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA7.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 March 2018 1 June 2008
Chip lithography 12 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 13 Watt

Tesla V100 FHHL has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 441.7% more advanced lithography process.

GMA X4500, on the other hand, has 1823.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla V100 FHHL and GMA X4500. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla V100 FHHL is a workstation graphics card while GMA X4500 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla V100 FHHL
Tesla V100 FHHL
Intel GMA X4500
GMA X4500

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 9 votes

Rate Tesla V100 FHHL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 324 votes

Rate GMA X4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.