Matrox Millennium G200 vs Tesla T4

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking196not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency27.66no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)G200 (1998−1999)
GPU code nameTU104Eclipse
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date13 September 2018 (6 years ago)1998 (26 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560no data
Core clock speed585 MHz84 MHz
Boost clock speed1590 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,600 million10 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm350 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Wattno data
Texture fill rate254.40.08
Floating-point processing power8.141 TFLOPSno data
ROPs641
TMUs1601
Tensor Cores320no data
Ray Tracing Cores40no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCI
Length168 mm150 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6SGR
Maximum RAM amount16 GB8 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz143 MHz
Memory bandwidth320.0 GB/s1.144 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)5.0
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6None
OpenCL1.2None
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 8 MB
Chip lithography 12 nm 350 nm

Tesla T4 has a 204700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2816.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Tesla T4 and Matrox Millennium G200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla T4 is a workstation graphics card while Matrox Millennium G200 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla T4
Tesla T4
Matrox Millennium G200
Millennium G200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 226 votes

Rate Tesla T4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 7 votes

Rate Matrox Millennium G200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.