Quadro M2200 vs Tesla T10

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
CMP 50HX GRID RTX T10-4 GRID RTX T10-8 GRID RTX T10-16 Quadro RTX 6000 Quadro RTX 6000 Passive Quadro RTX 8000 Quadro RTX 8000 Passive Tesla T10 Tesla T10 16 GB Tesla T10 24 GB Tesla T40 24 GB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro M1000M Quadro M1200 Quadro M2000M Quadro M2200 Quadro M3000M Quadro M4000M Quadro M5000M Quadro M5500

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Tesla T10 with Quadro M2200, including specs and performance data.

Tesla T10
24 GB GDDR6, 260 Watt
32.91
+197%

Tesla T10 outperforms M2200 by a whopping 197% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Tesla T10 Tesla T10
Quadro M2200 Quadro M2200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking171433
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.6813.80
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameTU102GM206
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release dateno data11 January 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores46081024
Core clock speedno data695 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHz1036 MHz
Number of transistors18,600 million2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)260 Watt55 Watt
Texture fill rate449.366.30
Floating-point processing power14.38 TFLOPS2.122 TFLOPS
ROPs9632
TMUs28864

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-A (3.0)
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount24 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed13 GB/s1377 MHz
Memory bandwidth624.0 GB/s88 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Display Portno data1.2

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+
3D Stereono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12
Shader Model6.76.4
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.31.1.126
CUDA7.55.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Tesla T10 32.91
+197%
Quadro M2200 11.07

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Tesla T10 12650
+197%
Quadro M2200 4255

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD120−130
+179%
43
−179%
4K40−45
+186%
14
−186%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Dota 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
+0%
37
+0%
Valorant 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Dota 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
+0%
20
+0%
Valorant 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
+0%
13
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

This is how Tesla T10 and Quadro M2200 compete in popular games:

  • Tesla T10 is 179% faster in 1080p
  • Tesla T10 is 186% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 67 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 32.91 11.07
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 260 Watt 55 Watt

Tesla T10 has a 197.3% higher aggregate performance score, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro M2200, on the other hand, has 372.7% lower power consumption.

The Tesla T10 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M2200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Tesla T10 is a workstation card while Quadro M2200 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Tesla T10
Tesla T10
NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Quadro M2200
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Tesla T10 Tesla T10
vs
PRO W7600 Radeon PRO W7600
Quadro M2200 Quadro M2200
vs
Quadro P1000 Quadro P1000
Tesla T10 Tesla T10
vs
Quadro T1000 Quadro T1000
Graphics (Ryzen 7000) Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
vs
Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
Radeon 610M 610M
vs
Apple M4 32-core GPU M4 32 core GPU
UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics (Elkhart Lake 32 EU)
vs
Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU M3 Max 40-Core GPU
RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X
vs
PRO W7800 PRO W7800
Tesla T10 Tesla T10
vs
M1000M M1000M
Tesla T10 Tesla T10
vs
CMP 50HX CMP 50HX
MX570 A MX570 A
vs
GTX 950M Mac Edition GTX 950M Mac Edition
MX570 A MX570 A
vs
Quadro P400 P400
MX570 A MX570 A
vs
9800 GT Rebrand 9800 GT Rebrand
RTX 4060 Mobile RTX 4060 Mobile
vs
Data Center GPU Flex 170 Data Center GPU Flex 170

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4 4 votes

Rate Tesla T10 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 380 votes

Rate Quadro M2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla T10 or Quadro M2200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.