GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Tesla T10

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
CMP 50HX GRID RTX T10-4 GRID RTX T10-8 GRID RTX T10-16 Quadro RTX 6000 Quadro RTX 6000 Passive Quadro RTX 8000 Quadro RTX 8000 Passive Tesla T10 Tesla T10 16 GB Tesla T10 24 GB Tesla T40 24 GB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 1050 Ti GTX 1060 6 GB GTX 1080 Ti GTX 1630 GTX 1650 GTX 1650 GDDR6 GTX 1650 SUPER GTX 1650 TU106 GTX 1650 TU116 GTX 1660 GTX 1660 Super GTX 1660 Ti

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Tesla T10 with GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER, including specs and performance data.

Tesla T10
24 GB GDDR6, 260 Watt
32.79
+24.5%

Tesla T10 outperforms GTX 1650 SUPER by a significant 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Tesla T10 Tesla T10
GTX 1650 SUPER GTX 1650 SUPER

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking162206
Place by popularitynot in top-10056
Power efficiency8.7718.31
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTU102TU116
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)22 November 2019 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores46081280
Core clock speedno data1530 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHz1725 MHz
Number of transistors18,600 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)260 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate449.3138.0
Floating-point processing power14.38 TFLOPS4.416 TFLOPS
ROPs9632
TMUs28880

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm229 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount24 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed13 GB/s12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth624.0 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+
Multi Monitorno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.31.2.131
CUDA7.57.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Tesla T10 32.79
+24.5%
GTX 1650 SUPER 26.34

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Tesla T10 12650
+24.5%
GTX 1650 SUPER 10163

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD85−90
+19.7%
71
−19.7%
1440p45−50
+21.6%
37
−21.6%
4K27−30
+22.7%
22
−22.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 63
+0%
63
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 53
+0%
53
+0%
Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50
+0%
50
+0%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Hitman 3 62
+0%
62
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Metro Exodus 69
+0%
69
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 84
+0%
84
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 180
+0%
180
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 26
+0%
26
+0%
Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40
+0%
40
+0%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Hitman 3 59
+0%
59
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Metro Exodus 82
+0%
82
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 101
+0%
101
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 180
+0%
180
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 15
+0%
15
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 34
+0%
34
+0%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Hitman 3 53
+0%
53
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 83
+0%
83
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 83
+0%
83
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50
+0%
50
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21
+0%
21
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 66
+0%
66
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 13
+0%
13
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 20
+0%
20
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Hitman 3 34
+0%
34
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60
+0%
60
+0%
Metro Exodus 55
+0%
55
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60
+0%
60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 164
+0%
164
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 44
+0%
44
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Hitman 3 34
+0%
34
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Metro Exodus 32
+0%
32
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 32
+0%
32
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5
+0%
5
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3
+0%
3
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30
+0%
30
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8
+0%
8
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21
+0%
21
+0%

This is how Tesla T10 and GTX 1650 SUPER compete in popular games:

  • Tesla T10 is 20% faster in 1080p
  • Tesla T10 is 22% faster in 1440p
  • Tesla T10 is 23% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 32.79 26.34
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 260 Watt 100 Watt

Tesla T10 has a 24.5% higher aggregate performance score, and a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1650 SUPER, on the other hand, has 160% lower power consumption.

The Tesla T10 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER in performance tests.

Be aware that Tesla T10 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Tesla T10
Tesla T10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Tesla T10 Tesla T10
vs
PRO W7600 Radeon PRO W7600
GTX 1650 SUPER GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
vs
GTX 1060 6 GB GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
Tesla T10 Tesla T10
vs
Quadro T1000 Quadro T1000
Qualcomm Adreno 690 Adreno 690
vs
RTX A500 RTX A500
Qualcomm Adreno 690 Adreno 690
vs
Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU M2 Max 38-Core GPU
Graphics (Ryzen 7000) Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
vs
HD 8400 Mobile IGP Radeon HD 8400 Mobile IGP
Raptor Lake GT1 Raptor Lake GT1
vs
RX 7600M Radeon RX 7600M
Tesla T10 Tesla T10
vs
P106-090 P106 090
RTX 4070 Mobile GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
vs
RX 6550S Radeon RX 6550S
RTX 4070 Mobile GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G4 48EU Mobile Iris Xe Graphics G4 48EU Mobile
A800 PCIe 80 GB A800 PCIe 80 GB
vs
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
A100X A100X
vs
Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB
PG506-207 PG506 207
vs
RX 7990 XTX Radeon RX 7990 XTX

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4 4 votes

Rate Tesla T10 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 4680 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.