Radeon Pro W6800X vs Tesla PG503-216

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated101
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data13.98
Power efficiencyno data13.94
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGV100Navi 21
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date26 November 2019 (4 years ago)3 August 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51203840
Core clock speed1312 MHz1800 MHz
Boost clock speed1530 MHz2087 MHz
Number of transistors21,100 million26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate489.6500.9
Floating-point processing power15.67 TFLOPS16.03 TFLOPS
ROPs12896
TMUs320240
Tensor Cores640no data
Ray Tracing Coresno data60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Apple MPX
Lengthno data267 mm
Width2-slotQuad-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneApple MPX

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 GB32 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1106 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth1,133 GB/s512.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 4x Thunderbolt
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA7.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 November 2019 3 August 2021
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 200 Watt

Pro W6800X has an age advantage of 1 year, a 71.4% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla PG503-216 and Radeon Pro W6800X. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla PG503-216
Tesla PG503-216
AMD Radeon Pro W6800X
Radeon Pro W6800X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.3 3 votes

Rate Tesla PG503-216 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 20 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6800X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.