Arc Pro A30M vs Tesla PG503-216

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated348
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data21.01
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGV100DG2-128
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date26 November 2019 (4 years ago)8 August 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51201024
Core clock speed1312 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed1530 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistors21,100 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate489.6128.0
Floating-point processing power15.67 TFLOPS4.096 TFLOPS
ROPs12832
TMUs32064
Tensor Cores640no data
Ray Tracing Coresno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 GB4 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1106 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth1,133 GB/s128.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA7.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 November 2019 8 August 2022
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 50 Watt

Tesla PG503-216 has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Arc Pro A30M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla PG503-216 and Arc Pro A30M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla PG503-216 is a workstation card while Arc Pro A30M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla PG503-216
Tesla PG503-216
Intel Arc Pro A30M
Arc Pro A30M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.3 3 votes

Rate Tesla PG503-216 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 6 votes

Rate Arc Pro A30M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.