Radeon RX 5900 XT vs Tesla P4

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking237not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.36no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGP104Navi 21
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date13 September 2016 (8 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25604352
Core clock speed886 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1114 MHz1735 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million21,000 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate178.2471.9
Floating-point processing power5.704 TFLOPS15.1 TFLOPS
ROPs6496
TMUs160272

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.3 GB/s672.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 300 Watt

Tesla P4 has 300% lower power consumption.

RX 5900 XT, on the other hand, has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Tesla P4 and Radeon RX 5900 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla P4 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 5900 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla P4
Tesla P4
AMD Radeon RX 5900 XT
Radeon RX 5900 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 73 votes

Rate Tesla P4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 67 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.