Quadro FX 550M vs Tesla P4

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking239not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.52no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameGP104G73
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date13 September 2016 (8 years ago)13 March 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560no data
Core clock speed886 MHz480 MHz
Boost clock speed1114 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,200 million177 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate178.25.760
Floating-point processing power5.704 TFLOPSno data
ROPs648
TMUs16012

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.3 GB/s16 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.43.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 September 2016 13 March 2006
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 16 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 35 Watt

Tesla P4 has an age advantage of 10 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 462.5% more advanced lithography process.

FX 550M, on the other hand, has 114.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla P4 and Quadro FX 550M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla P4 is a workstation card while Quadro FX 550M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla P4
Tesla P4
NVIDIA Quadro FX 550M
Quadro FX 550M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 73 votes

Rate Tesla P4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 550M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.