Radeon Pro W5500X vs Tesla P100 SXM2

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated288
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data20.19
Power efficiencyno data10.62
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameGP100Navi 14
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date5 April 2016 (8 years ago)11 December 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35841536
Core clock speed1328 MHz1187 MHz
Boost clock speed1480 MHz1757 MHz
Number of transistors15,300 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt125 Watt
Texture fill rate331.5168.7
Floating-point processing power10.61 TFLOPS5.398 TFLOPS
ROPs9632
TMUs22496

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB8 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed704 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth720.9 GB/s224.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x HDMI 2.0b
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 April 2016 11 December 2019
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 125 Watt

Tesla P100 SXM2 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Pro W5500X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 140% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla P100 SXM2 and Radeon Pro W5500X. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2
Tesla P100 SXM2
AMD Radeon Pro W5500X
Radeon Pro W5500X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 49 votes

Rate Tesla P100 SXM2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 2 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W5500X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.