GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile vs Tesla M2090
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Tesla M2090 with GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile, including specs and performance data.
RTX 4090 Mobile outperforms Tesla M2090 by a whopping 658% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 465 | 18 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 2.62 | 41.42 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) | Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) |
| GPU code name | GF110 | AD103 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 25 July 2011 (13 years ago) | 3 January 2023 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 512 | 9728 |
| Core clock speed | 651 MHz | 1335 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1695 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 3,000 million | 45,900 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 41.66 | 515.3 |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.332 TFLOPS | 32.98 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48 | 112 |
| TMUs | 64 | 304 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 304 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 76 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | large |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | 248 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 924 MHz | 2250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 177.4 GB/s | 576.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
| CUDA | 2.0 | 8.9 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 21−24
−738%
| 176
+738%
|
| 1440p | 16−18
−731%
| 133
+731%
|
| 4K | 10−12
−720%
| 82
+720%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 220
+0%
|
220
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 156
+0%
|
156
+0%
|
| Elden Ring | 189
+0%
|
189
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 110−120
+0%
|
110−120
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 143
+0%
|
143
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 71
+0%
|
71
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 398
+0%
|
398
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 148
+0%
|
148
+0%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 130−140
+0%
|
130−140
+0%
|
| Valorant | 350−400
+0%
|
350−400
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 110−120
+0%
|
110−120
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 132
+0%
|
132
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 68
+0%
|
68
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 174
+0%
|
174
+0%
|
| Elden Ring | 336
+0%
|
336
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 136
+0%
|
136
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 280−290
+0%
|
280−290
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 387
+0%
|
387
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 162
+0%
|
162
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 138
+0%
|
138
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 210−220
+0%
|
210−220
+0%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 130−140
+0%
|
130−140
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 170−180
+0%
|
170−180
+0%
|
| Valorant | 262
+0%
|
262
+0%
|
| World of Tanks | 270−280
+0%
|
270−280
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 110−120
+0%
|
110−120
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 123
+0%
|
123
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 63
+0%
|
63
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 187
+0%
|
187
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 130−140
+0%
|
130−140
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 369
+0%
|
369
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 210−220
+0%
|
210−220
+0%
|
| Valorant | 350−400
+0%
|
350−400
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Dota 2 | 138
+0%
|
138
+0%
|
| Elden Ring | 219
+0%
|
219
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 139
+0%
|
139
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+0%
|
170−180
+0%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 90−95
+0%
|
90−95
+0%
|
| World of Tanks | 516
+0%
|
516
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 85−90
+0%
|
85−90
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 90
+0%
|
90
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 47
+0%
|
47
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 160−170
+0%
|
160−170
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 294
+0%
|
294
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 128
+0%
|
128
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 164
+0%
|
164
+0%
|
| Valorant | 300−350
+0%
|
300−350
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 63
+0%
|
63
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 172
+0%
|
172
+0%
|
| Elden Ring | 112
+0%
|
112
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 174
+0%
|
174
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 82
+0%
|
82
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 200−210
+0%
|
200−210
+0%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 174
+0%
|
174
+0%
|
| World of Tanks | 314
+0%
|
314
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 90−95
+0%
|
90−95
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 90−95
+0%
|
90−95
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 24
+0%
|
24
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 179
+0%
|
179
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 95−100
+0%
|
95−100
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 156
+0%
|
156
+0%
|
| Valorant | 180−190
+0%
|
180−190
+0%
|
This is how Tesla M2090 and RTX 4090 Mobile compete in popular games:
- RTX 4090 Mobile is 738% faster in 1080p
- RTX 4090 Mobile is 731% faster in 1440p
- RTX 4090 Mobile is 720% faster in 4K
All in all, in popular games:
- there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 9.53 | 72.20 |
| Recency | 25 July 2011 | 3 January 2023 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 16 GB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 120 Watt |
RTX 4090 Mobile has a 657.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 900% more advanced lithography process, and 108.3% lower power consumption.
The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Tesla M2090 in performance tests.
Be aware that Tesla M2090 is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
