H200 SXM 141 GB vs Tesla M2075

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Hopper (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGF110GH100
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date25 July 2011 (13 years ago)18 November 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,399 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores44816896
Core clock speed574 MHz1590 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1980 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million80,000 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt700 Watt
Texture fill rate32.141,045
Floating-point processing power1.028 TFLOPS66.91 TFLOPS
ROPs4824
TMUs56528
Tensor Coresno data528

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length248 mm267 mm
Width2-slotSXM Module
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM3e
Maximum RAM amount6 GB141 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit5120 Bit
Memory clock speed783 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth150.3 GB/s3.36 TB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)N/A
Shader Model5.1N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.09.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 July 2011 18 November 2024
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 141 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 700 Watt

Tesla M2075 has 250% lower power consumption.

H200 SXM 141 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, a 2250% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Tesla M2075 and H200 SXM 141 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla M2075
Tesla M2075
NVIDIA H200 SXM 141 GB
H200 SXM 141 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Tesla M2075 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 2 votes

Rate H200 SXM 141 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla M2075 or H200 SXM 141 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.