RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile vs Tesla M2070

Place in the ranking	632	109
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.10	no data
Power efficiency	1.50	23.73
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	GF100	no data
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	25 July 2011 (13 years ago)	21 March 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$3,099	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	448	3072
Core clock speed	574 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	3,100 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	32.14	no data
Floating-point processing power	1.03 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	48	no data
TMUs	56	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	no data
Length	248 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	783 MHz	16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	150.3 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate
Shader Model	5.1	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	1.1	no data
Vulkan	N/A	-
CUDA	2.0	-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	4.88	39.43
Recency	25 July 2011	21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	115 Watt

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has a 708% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 95.7% lower power consumption.

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Tesla M2070 in performance tests.

Be aware that Tesla M2070 is a workstation card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.