GeForce 7800 GT vs Tesla M2070

Place in the ranking	632	1190
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.10	no data
Power efficiency	1.50	0.67
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code name	GF100	G70
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	25 July 2011 (13 years ago)	11 August 2005 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$3,099	$449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Tesla M2070 and 7800 GT have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	448	no data
Core clock speed	574 MHz	400 MHz
Number of transistors	3,100 million	302 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	65 Watt
Texture fill rate	32.14	8.000
Floating-point processing power	1.03 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	48	16
TMUs	56	20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 1.0 x16
Length	248 mm	226 mm
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	256 MB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	783 MHz	500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	150.3 GB/s	32 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model	5.1	3.0
OpenGL	4.6	2.1
OpenCL	1.1	N/A
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	2.0	-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	4.88	0.63
Recency	25 July 2011	11 August 2005
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	256 MB
Chip lithography	40 nm	110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	65 Watt

Tesla M2070 has a 674.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 175% more advanced lithography process.

7800 GT, on the other hand, has 246.2% lower power consumption.

The Tesla M2070 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 7800 GT in performance tests.

Be aware that Tesla M2070 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 7800 GT is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.