ATI Radeon 9800 PRO MAXX vs Tesla K80m

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)R300 (2005−2008)
GPU code nameGK210R350
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date17 November 2014 (10 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2x 2496no data
Core clock speed562 MHz380 MHz
Boost clock speed824 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,100 million117 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt94 Watt
Texture fill rate2x 182.2 billion/sec3.040
ROPs2x 488
TMUs2x 2088

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount2x 12 GB128 MB
Memory bus width2x 384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed5012 MHz680 MBps
Memory bandwidth2x 240.6 GB/s21.76 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 (11_1)9.0 (9_0)
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 94 Watt

Tesla K80m has a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9800 PRO MAXX, on the other hand, has 219.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla K80m and Radeon 9800 PRO MAXX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla K80m is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 9800 PRO MAXX is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla K80m
Tesla K80m
ATI Radeon 9800 PRO MAXX
Radeon 9800 PRO MAXX

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 10 votes

Rate Tesla K80m on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 9800 PRO MAXX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.