GRID K160Q vs Tesla K80m

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated950
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.21
Power efficiencyno data0.87
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGK210GK107
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date17 November 2014 (10 years ago)28 June 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$125

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2x 2496192
Core clock speed562 MHz850 MHz
Boost clock speed824 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,100 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate2x 182.2 billion/sec13.60
Floating-point processing powerno data0.3264 TFLOPS
ROPs2x 4816
TMUs2x 20816

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2x 12 GB1 GB
Memory bus width2x 384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed5012 MHz891 MHz
Memory bandwidth2x 240.6 GB/s28.51 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 (11_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 November 2014 28 June 2013
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 130 Watt

Tesla K80m has an age advantage of 1 year.

GRID K160Q, on the other hand, has 130.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla K80m and GRID K160Q. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla K80m
Tesla K80m
NVIDIA GRID K160Q
GRID K160Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 10 votes

Rate Tesla K80m on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID K160Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.