Quadro K2200 vs Tesla K80

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Tesla K80 and Quadro K2200, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Tesla K80
2014
12 GB GDDR5, 300 Watt
15.19
+64.4%

Tesla K80 outperforms K2200 by an impressive 64% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking351476
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.21
Power efficiency3.479.32
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameGK210GM107
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date17 November 2014 (10 years ago)22 July 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$395.75

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2496640
Core clock speed562 MHz1046 MHz
Boost clock speed824 MHz1124 MHz
Number of transistors7,100 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt68 Watt
Texture fill rate171.444.96
Floating-point processing power4.113 TFLOPS1.439 TFLOPS
ROPs4816
TMUs20840

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mm202 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount12 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth240.6 GB/s80.19 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.126+
CUDA3.75.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Tesla K80 15.19
+64.4%
Quadro K2200 9.24

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Tesla K80 5852
+64.4%
Quadro K2200 3559

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Tesla K80 16063
+40.8%
Quadro K2200 11410

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.19 9.24
Recency 17 November 2014 22 July 2014
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 68 Watt

Tesla K80 has a 64.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 months, and a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Quadro K2200, on the other hand, has 341.2% lower power consumption.

The Tesla K80 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K2200 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla K80
Tesla K80
NVIDIA Quadro K2200
Quadro K2200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 183 votes

Rate Tesla K80 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 420 votes

Rate Quadro K2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.